Plutarch, an ancient Greek historian and philosopher, believed in the wisdom and prudence that comes with age. He argued that older individuals have a cautious approach that benefits the state, contrasting it with the impulsive nature of the younger generation. Looking at the current political landscape, we see a prevalence of older leaders in countries like the United States, Russia, China, India, Pakistan, and others. This trend towards “gerontocracy” is a noticeable feature of today’s world.
While there are exceptions with younger leaders like France’s Gabriel Attal, the overall dominance of older individuals in positions of power raises questions about the dynamics of leadership and governance. Samuel Moyn, a historian and philosopher, notes that modern societies have paradoxically shifted back to valuing the authority of elders despite initial attempts to empower the youth during the transition to modernity.
The persistence of gerontocracy is not just a result of demographic shifts but also reflects deeper issues of class and power. Political systems in many countries are structured to maintain stability and protect the existing elite, making it challenging for new voices and ideas to emerge. This entrenchment of wealth and power within certain families and classes contributes to the continuation of old ideas and practices in governance.
In the context of the upcoming elections globally, including the end of Tory rule in Britain, it is essential to consider the underlying factors that keep the old in power. Rather than focusing solely on age, we should examine how systems perpetuate inequality and limit the entry of outsider perspectives. The conversation should shift towards addressing the root causes of gerontocracy and promoting diversity in leadership to ensure a more inclusive and dynamic political landscape.
