A recent court ruling in New Zealand found that the University of Auckland failed to protect microbiologist Siouxsie Wiles from intense abuse and harassment she faced while sharing information about the COVID-19 pandemic. The court awarded Wiles NZ$20,000 in damages, acknowledging that the university breached its obligations to ensure her health and safety.
The attacks on Wiles began in March 2020, leading to abusive messages, personal information leaks, and even her home being defaced. Despite seeking support from the university, Wiles found their policies inadequate in addressing the abuse. The judge ruled that the university’s response exacerbated Wiles’ distress and failed to act in good faith, ultimately ordering damages to be paid to Wiles.
One of the key debates in this case was whether Wiles’ public commentary on COVID-19 was considered part of her work. The judge concluded that it was indeed part of her job, making her a target for abuse. This ruling is significant for academics, highlighting the importance of employers ensuring the safety of their staff, especially when engaging in public discussions related to their work.
While the court did not find that the university suppressed Wiles’ academic freedom by advising her to reduce public commentary, experts emphasize the need for institutions to improve their strategies for protecting staff from harassment. The judgment serves as a wake-up call for universities worldwide to prioritize the safety and well-being of their employees, particularly when they are active in media engagements.
In response to the ruling, the University of Auckland stated that they have implemented recommendations from a security audit to provide additional support and resources for staff facing harassment. This proactive approach aims to create a safer environment for academics like Wiles who engage in public discourse related to their expertise.
